|
Home | Forums | Register | Vendors | Garage | Forum Rules | FAQ | Classifieds | Calendar | Mark Forums Read | Track Locator |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() | #21 | |
Addict | ![]() Quote: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 6023 - Signature Series Brad Hill Edition Full Mod Zenoah 4 Bolt 30.5cc Game Over Engine - Billet Crankcase - Full Mod Engines - Engines - HPI Baja, etc. your engine was bought off the shelf. Noting custom about that. Just customized. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() You can't even multiply to get the final gear ratio of your customized?????? which is a 6.48:1. You will only get so much speed from hp and over gearing will not help. That includes bigger tires and wrong gearing. The only thing you care about is MPH and to get that you know nothing about how to do it but over gear. All you know how to do is buy products off the shelf and call it custom. ![]() ![]() ![]() So keep on doing speed laps up and down the street you have plenty more MPH to chase but not enough room to do it. I have seen the end results of what happens when some one like yo keeps on playing in the street. IT WILL BE ALL YOR FAULT AND YOU WILL PAY ALL DAMAGES! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() AS for the links they are all real and available. I don't have to fake something to look good. I prefer sit back and watch the accuser fake their way out. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by king quarterscale; 06-19-2017 at 07:04 AM. | |
![]() | ![]() |
Sponsored Links | |
![]() | #22 | |
Newbie | ![]() Quote: According to the link you posted that "proves" your point, this is the same engine you say I purchased?? ![]() ![]() Funny.....other than the wildly popular OBR 3pc crankcase & V2 sealed clutch housing.....and of course the 30mm crankshaft required to reach the 30.5cc combustion chamber volume....I don't see any similarities.... And according to the web page you linked to, that is a 30.5cc alright, but it clearly states that it is the "Brad Hill "Game Over" signature series engine" and "This engine is designed and tuned exclusively for oval racing and is not suited for bashing" This clear statement by the engine builder, leads me to believe that that specific engine is tuned for much higher rpm power band, and has a high exhaust port roof, along with slightly lower compression to make any possible extra rpm peak increase. This scenario is QUITE DRASTICALLY different from the port timing that I personally spec'd my cylinder to, being that I desired a higher torque peak much lower in the rpm range, and made no port timing or ignition timing efforts towards increasing upper-rpm peak. And, also, clearly, does not have a billet head kit with a Zenoah cylinder machined to accept a 17:1 compression dome, which would decrease peak rpm noticeably, and most definitely not a desirable trait for circle-track racing. Hmm...either do I see any of the the billet mounts, manifold, or even the same carburetor on that engine you linked....you sure you linked the right engine?? ![]() ![]() You should also easily know the exact weight of this flywheel that I spent several long evenings shaving, drilling, and balancing in this "off the shelf" motor?? ![]() Or can you just tell me the squish clearance on that 17:1 dome? Or, hell, how about just simply what piston is in there at all? LOL.......how deep are your pockets buddy? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() And since you're so excessively knowledgeable about THIS EXACT motor that I've "bought off the shelf", how about you even fill me in on the transfer port roof timing? Or maybe even the EXACT (I want down to the .1-degrees please!) exhaust port roof that I had such fun getting right? Should be easy, right? I mean, It was "bought off the shelf" so you should be able to google it and link to it in seconds......no hurry.......I'll wait.... And, of course, just as a teaser to throw in there about gearing.....here's some homework for you to prove wrong..... Link away homie! Hahaha! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SPUR....PINION....RATIO......SPEED.......POWER.... .TOTAL TEETH 58........16..........3,63........-8 %.........+8 %.......74 (correct mesh) 57........16..........3,56........-6 %.........+6 %.......73 57........17..........3,35.........0 %...........0 %.......74 (correct mesh) 57........18..........3,17........+6 %.........-6 %.......75 56........18..........3,11........+7 %.........-7 %.......74 (correct mesh) 55........18..........3,06........+9 %.........-9 %.......73 56........19..........2,95........+12 %.......-12 %......75 55........19..........2,89........+14 %.......-14 %......74 (correct mesh) 54........20..........2,70........+19 %.......-19 %......74 (correct mesh) 53........21..........2,52........+25%........-25%.......74 (correct mesh) 52........22..........2,36........+30 %.......-30 %......74 (correct mesh) And, just for extra gigglesnorts, here's one of my scribble sheets of gearing options that I've calculated with my GPS telemetry through various gearing and tire/wheel options that I currently have, and the calculated estimations of top speeds, and also rpm for each individual gear..... ![]() That should keep you busy for a little bit ![]() ![]() Last edited by bobdudeguyman; 06-19-2017 at 11:34 AM. | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #23 |
Addict | ![]() You can throw out all the info you want. You bought the motor from OBR and the add on's. That is 100% fact. Just cause you can throw out numbers doesn't mean a thing. As for calculating the gear ratios you can't even do that right. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() RPM is useless in calculating speed. The HP and torque band are lower than the peak RPM which doesn't make any HP. OBR knows how to build motors and isn't going to nickel and dime trying to build a motor that people can't afford. So if you did machine this motor you got it wrong with the numbers just as you have with the final gearing. ![]() Before these motors came to market they were using chain saw motors which had lower RPM and Huge HP. Times have changed and the EPA cracked down on manufacturing forcing them make the emissions better. it's still going on today. So Rpm is useless to calculate speed. So many are getting faster speeds than you with less HP. Something is REAL funky here?????? YOUR numbers. ![]() Last edited by king quarterscale; 06-19-2017 at 04:31 PM. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #24 |
Addict Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Huntington
Posts: 330
| ![]() There we go a good discussion going and we are going to keep it going till the sun comes up Hay King are you sure your right He had some points there Better check your links just to be sure I'd hate to see you have to admit your wrong |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #25 | |
Addict | ![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #26 |
Addict Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Huntington
Posts: 330
| ![]() Now King a waste of money if he's happy that's all that matters Besides you have me to be disappointed in when you're wrong And your wrong as usual But keep trying sooner or later your bound to get one right Last edited by Nitrocat; 06-19-2017 at 11:51 PM. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #27 |
Addict | ![]() How can I be WRONG when all you do is post a pile of poop and and someone can't calculate gearing to figure out speed. Using RPM is use less as RPM and power are lost threw the transmission. You can never get the max rpm from any motor. My calculation is right on with a 57/18 to start giving a final ratio of 7.59:1 with a truck of 7.65. NOT a 6.48:1 which is over geared slowing the motor down with truck tires and not to mention the stock canister muffler with the added silencer which also reduce power.. Again back to the real issue Speed is time over distance! Last edited by king quarterscale; 06-20-2017 at 06:10 AM. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #28 |
Addict Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Huntington
Posts: 330
| ![]() As usual King how can you calculate the rpm of a motor you never have seen or heard run without a tack to read rpm So that means you're off quite a bit Last edited by Nitrocat; 06-20-2017 at 10:36 AM. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #29 |
Newbie Join Date: May 2018 Location: United States Florida
Posts: 6
| ![]() Less weight and more HP will result in a faster speed over distance. SO if you think holding the throttle wide open during the entire run will achieve full speed you are loosing top speed. You can easily go faster with tuning to 65-70 mph. Just not the way your doing it now. You can also use a 2 speed for lord of ocean speed but until you understand HP it would be useless. Real racers never talk about speed. All hey talk about is HP. You can only get so much speed from gearing hp Last edited by Deeann; 01-23-2019 at 02:57 AM. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #30 | |
Addict | ![]() Quote:
Someone gets it! I think I said this before somewhere??????? The OP thinks he is the fastest around but hasn't hit the 100 MPH club yet and never will. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #31 |
Newbie Join Date: May 2018 Location: United States Florida
Posts: 6
| ![]() with increase gearing it can do a little more but you will lose some low end. With a 8 hp motor the speed should be in the 60mph range and with higher gears a little tools backpack
. A stock muffler doesn't add anything. A tune pipe will. As with a 2 speed kit too properly tuned. Last edited by Deeann; 03-15-2019 at 01:31 AM. |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Official RCMAX announcement | Crazy_Stu | Engine & Exhaust | 1 | 05-13-2017 09:43 AM |
9/20/09 Official Race Results | robmob | RAMS RC Racing Club | 1 | 09-22-2009 01:49 PM |
9/13/09 Official Race Results | robmob | RAMS RC Racing Club | 3 | 09-21-2009 05:13 PM |
7/19/09 Official Race Results | robmob | RAMS RC Racing Club | 0 | 07-20-2009 01:40 PM |
Its Official! | RobertZ | Chit Chat | 7 | 12-26-2008 02:59 PM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
| |